Comments on: Who Is (((Billy))) and What Is He Trying To Do http://iambilly.wordpress.com Musings and ramblings about the world, progressive politics, religion, history, family and (occasionally) humour. Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:24:29 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Micky http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2926 Micky Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:16:48 +0000 #comment-2926 Mark 16: 16 He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned. <a href="http://www.gotquestions.org/repentance.html" rel="nofollow"> Repent! </a> Mark 16: 16 He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned.

Repent!

]]> By: Rycharde Manne http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2449 Rycharde Manne Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:11:55 +0000 #comment-2449 Hi I've added your blog here http://aggregatedinfidels.blogspot.com/2008/12/billy-atheist.html Feel free to let me know if you'd like the intro changed. all the best. Hi
I’ve added your blog here
http://aggregatedinfidels.blogspot.com/2008/12/billy-atheist.html
Feel free to let me know if you’d like the intro changed.
all the best.

]]> By: (((Billy))) http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2118 (((Billy))) Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:31:00 +0000 #comment-2118 Dennis: Glad you could stop by. Glad I could induce a smile. Which link hit your blog? Since you left neither a valid email nor a valid URL I can't be sure. Not a demand, just curious. Dennis: Glad you could stop by. Glad I could induce a smile. Which link hit your blog? Since you left neither a valid email nor a valid URL I can’t be sure. Not a demand, just curious.

]]> By: dennispope http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2117 dennispope Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:15:05 +0000 #comment-2117 (((Billy))), I had a hit on my blog from a link on one of your posts so I thought I'd stop by for a look-see. Interesting. The idea of atheism make me smile. (((Billy))),

I had a hit on my blog from a link on one of your posts so I thought I’d stop by for a look-see.

Interesting. The idea of atheism make me smile.

]]> By: (((Billy))) http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2054 (((Billy))) Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:04:55 +0000 #comment-2054 Diaphanus: Glad to have you stop by. Enjoy. (and contribute (or not (who am I to tell people what to do?))) Diaphanus: Glad to have you stop by. Enjoy. (and contribute (or not (who am I to tell people what to do?)))

]]> By: Diaphanus http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2051 Diaphanus Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:03:34 +0000 #comment-2051 Hi! I found you through the Atheist Blogroll! Hi!

I found you through the Atheist Blogroll!

]]> By: yunshui http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-1721 yunshui Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:35:48 +0000 #comment-1721 mohmood: Hamann's (noted American biologist? He's a hack professor at a Bible college!) god is, as so often in science, a "god of the gaps", thrown into the mix to explain anything science hasn't yet answered and getting smaller by the year. Let me make a suggestion. So far, you've been throwing up kindergarten level arguments (argument from authority, argument from incredulity, god of the gaps) which virtually every atheist worth his or her salt has encountered and countered so many times it bores us to think of it. I suggest, therefore, that before posting another unintelligible exposition on (((Billy)))'s homepage, you familiarize yourself with at least basic counterapologetics - <a href="http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Main_Page" rel="nofollow">Iron Chariots</a>, though based on Christian, not Muslim apologetics, would be the best place to start. If you find that your argument has <em>not</em> already been dealt with there, please feel free to drop over to my blog and posit it - I'm always interested to see a new theistic argument. However, if you're only going to rehash the same old tired apologetics which the atheist community have dealt with oh-so-many tedious times, then please - don't bother. Take (((Billy)))'s advice and start up your own blog. mohmood:

Hamann’s (noted American biologist? He’s a hack professor at a Bible college!) god is, as so often in science, a “god of the gaps”, thrown into the mix to explain anything science hasn’t yet answered and getting smaller by the year. Let me make a suggestion. So far, you’ve been throwing up kindergarten level arguments (argument from authority, argument from incredulity, god of the gaps) which virtually every atheist worth his or her salt has encountered and countered so many times it bores us to think of it. I suggest, therefore, that before posting another unintelligible exposition on (((Billy)))’s homepage, you familiarize yourself with at least basic counterapologetics – Iron Chariots, though based on Christian, not Muslim apologetics, would be the best place to start.

If you find that your argument has not already been dealt with there, please feel free to drop over to my blog and posit it – I’m always interested to see a new theistic argument. However, if you’re only going to rehash the same old tired apologetics which the atheist community have dealt with oh-so-many tedious times, then please – don’t bother. Take (((Billy)))’s advice and start up your own blog.

]]> By: (((Billy))) http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-1720 (((Billy))) Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:40:31 +0000 #comment-1720 I called you a troll. An internet troll is someone who shifts goalposts, changes arguments in the middle, calls others intellectual cowards, attempts to enforce rules on someone elses blog. These are also common traits of theists commenting or posting on the web. Please, feel free to find someone else. I would be happy to argue or discuss the ideas of atheism and irrationlity, but I still cannot figure out your argument(s). You said <i>"the required protocol of decency is to be maintained"</i>. Required by whom? If you want to have a discussion and/or argument with 'required' protocols, start your own blog. Nowhere does it say, anywhere on my blog, that there are required protocols. I generally treat my comenteers with exactly the decency they deserve. You request respect, you have to give respect to earn it. Speaking of requests, you asserted that science (or scientific apparatus) can be used to prove the existence of god(s). I asked for one citation, one example. Go for it. I called you a troll. An internet troll is someone who shifts goalposts, changes arguments in the middle, calls others intellectual cowards, attempts to enforce rules on someone elses blog. These are also common traits of theists commenting or posting on the web.

Please, feel free to find someone else. I would be happy to argue or discuss the ideas of atheism and irrationlity, but I still cannot figure out your argument(s).

You said “the required protocol of decency is to be maintained”. Required by whom? If you want to have a discussion and/or argument with ‘required’ protocols, start your own blog. Nowhere does it say, anywhere on my blog, that there are required protocols. I generally treat my comenteers with exactly the decency they deserve.

You request respect, you have to give respect to earn it.

Speaking of requests, you asserted that science (or scientific apparatus) can be used to prove the existence of god(s). I asked for one citation, one example. Go for it.

]]> By: mohmood http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-1719 mohmood Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:55:49 +0000 #comment-1719 Respected bill. thanks for abusing me. abusing is a rudimentary human trait where capacity to argue further on the basis of reason stops for the moment.may be it confirms the conventional standard of thinking in contrast to critical thinking that besides; reason; rationale; there subsists emotion also.I quote one instance of science and scientist suggesting that God exists as under:Dr. cecil Boyce Hamann the noted american biologist says:"where the mysteries of digestion and assimilation were seen as evidence of divine intervention; they now are explained in terms of chemical reactions; each reaction under the control of enzyme. but does it rule God out of his universe?who determined these reactions should take place; and that they should be so exactly controlled by the enzymes? one glance at a present day-chart of the various cyclic reactions and their interaction with each other rules out the possibility that this was just a chance relationship that happened to work. perhaps; here more than any place else; man is learning thatGod works by principles that he established with the creation of life" { refer evidence of God in expanding universe pg.221}here Dr. boyce was not influnced by bigoted book; nor any illogical apostle message motivated him to say so.Dr. boyce is noted biologist who while teaching or explaining the biology could be assumed sane; but; while infering the perception of extra power to see the the balance of chemical reactions so error free he got the idea of Design and designer; as such in next brath can;t be held insane. which; simply means once you see the design you immediately get the idea that somebody is its designer.thus; the universe being big design can;t be without its designer.your athiest blog carries ethical message that while discussing the three major religionsviz; christainity; juduasim; and islam;the required protocol of decency is to be maintained. divergent opnions are there that is why athiest blog had come into existence.had there been no theists; there was no necessity to create blog much less to say athiests.if iam non-sensical ; yet; iam relaxed i could find another one from your neigbhour- hood who also compensated my deficiency of being less read.Nothwithstanding; the pungent expressed against me I never lost the love and respect for all of you . thanks Respected bill. thanks for abusing me. abusing is a rudimentary human trait where capacity to argue further on the basis of reason stops for the moment.may be it confirms the conventional standard of thinking in contrast to critical thinking that besides; reason; rationale; there subsists emotion also.I quote one instance of science and scientist suggesting that God exists as under:Dr. cecil Boyce Hamann the noted american biologist says:”where the mysteries of digestion and assimilation were seen as evidence of divine intervention; they now are explained in terms of chemical reactions; each reaction under the control of enzyme. but does it rule God out of his universe?who determined these reactions should take place; and that they should be so exactly controlled by the enzymes? one glance at a present day-chart of the various cyclic reactions and their interaction with each other rules out the possibility that this was just a chance relationship that happened to work. perhaps; here more than any place else; man is learning thatGod works by principles that he established with the creation of life” { refer evidence of God in expanding universe pg.221}here Dr. boyce was not influnced by bigoted book; nor any illogical apostle message motivated him to say so.Dr. boyce is noted biologist who while teaching or explaining the biology could be assumed sane; but; while infering the perception of extra power to see the the balance of chemical reactions so error free he got the idea of Design and designer; as such in next brath can;t be held insane. which; simply means once you see the design you immediately get the idea that somebody is its designer.thus; the universe being big design can;t be without its designer.your athiest blog carries ethical message that while discussing the three major religionsviz; christainity; juduasim; and islam;the required protocol of decency is to be maintained. divergent opnions are there that is why athiest blog had come into existence.had there been no theists; there was no necessity to create blog much less to say athiests.if iam non-sensical ; yet; iam relaxed i could find another one from your neigbhour- hood who also compensated my deficiency of being less read.Nothwithstanding; the pungent expressed against me I never lost the love and respect for all of you . thanks

]]> By: (((Billy))) http://iambilly.wordpress.com/about/#comment-1715 (((Billy))) Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:46:34 +0000 #comment-1715 Info101: I did take a look at your group. I thought I left a message, but I don't remember (they say that as you get older, your memory is the second thing to go; the first thing is, umm . . .). Anyway, I'm not much of a joiner (never have been), plus with my job, I always work weekends (which is another reason I'm not much of a joiner). Thanks for the invite anyway, but maybe later. Info101: I did take a look at your group. I thought I left a message, but I don’t remember (they say that as you get older, your memory is the second thing to go; the first thing is, umm . . .). Anyway, I’m not much of a joiner (never have been), plus with my job, I always work weekends (which is another reason I’m not much of a joiner). Thanks for the invite anyway, but maybe later.

]]>