<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blogging Meme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iambilly.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/the-blogging-meme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iambilly.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/the-blogging-meme/</link>
	<description>Musings and ramblings about the world, progressive politics, religion, history, family and (occasionally) humour.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: (((Billy)))</title>
		<link>http://iambilly.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/the-blogging-meme/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>(((Billy)))</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iambilly.wordpress.com/?p=509#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>L.L.:  Thanks for stopping by.  Unfortunately, I think that anonymity  (or, in my case, pseudonymity) stems from two sources:  the desire to be offensive without paying a price and the desire to be honest without paying a price.  Either way, it is a source of cowardice, which is not necessarily a bad thing.  If anonymity or pseudonymity allows honesty, well . . . .

Chappie (and L.L.):  Dividing by zero requires the use of the number 42.  And &quot;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&quot;, being the square root of -1, will be obvious in about 2,000 years.  Trust me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L.L.:  Thanks for stopping by.  Unfortunately, I think that anonymity  (or, in my case, pseudonymity) stems from two sources:  the desire to be offensive without paying a price and the desire to be honest without paying a price.  Either way, it is a source of cowardice, which is not necessarily a bad thing.  If anonymity or pseudonymity allows honesty, well . . . .</p>
<p>Chappie (and L.L.):  Dividing by zero requires the use of the number 42.  And &#8220;<i>i</i>&#8220;, being the square root of -1, will be obvious in about 2,000 years.  Trust me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the chaplain</title>
		<link>http://iambilly.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/the-blogging-meme/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>the chaplain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iambilly.wordpress.com/?p=509#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>Nice response. I&#039;ve learned a lot from reading your blog, but I still don&#039;t have the hang of dividing by zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice response. I&#8217;ve learned a lot from reading your blog, but I still don&#8217;t have the hang of dividing by zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.L. Barkat</title>
		<link>http://iambilly.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/the-blogging-meme/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>L.L. Barkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iambilly.wordpress.com/?p=509#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>Very amusing, on the rule posting. Very amusing, on the rule posting. (See, I think this doubles thing might be something funky about your blog... just maybe.)

Stalking? Heavens, that&#039;s a scary thought. And even scarier to think one would do it with the supposed sanction of God.

Writing. Yes! Yes! Double yes. (Did I say that already? Sort of? I&#039;m telling you, it&#039;s your blog.)

Finally, did you learn that zero thing from Lynet? And just what is &quot;i&quot; in actual numbers? (I&#039;m thinking it might be 2. At least here on this blog.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very amusing, on the rule posting. Very amusing, on the rule posting. (See, I think this doubles thing might be something funky about your blog&#8230; just maybe.)</p>
<p>Stalking? Heavens, that&#8217;s a scary thought. And even scarier to think one would do it with the supposed sanction of God.</p>
<p>Writing. Yes! Yes! Double yes. (Did I say that already? Sort of? I&#8217;m telling you, it&#8217;s your blog.)</p>
<p>Finally, did you learn that zero thing from Lynet? And just what is &#8220;i&#8221; in actual numbers? (I&#8217;m thinking it might be 2. At least here on this blog.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
